Wire Netting Stores Delhi And Anr. vs The Regional Provident Fund ... on 8 May, 1981

 Wire Netting Stores Delhi And Anr. vs The Regional Provident Fund ... on 8 May, 1981

Showing the contexts in which working journalist act doctypes: delhi appears in the document

 

decision of the Employees' Insurance Court lies to the High Court if it involves a substantial question of law. There is thus ample safeguard made by the Employees' State Insurance Act for proper adjudication .and effective hearing. Similarly, quantification under the Industrial DisputesAct could be referred to Labour. Courts or Tribunals which are manned by duly qualified persons, as provider by the statute itself. The payment of Wages Act makes provision for an appeal to a judicial tribunal by virtue of Section 17. One could cite many other examples where such provisions -have been made, including the Working Journalists Act: It is paramount where any liability is to be fixed that the authority empowered to adjudicate must be anauthority with qualifications relevant to the matter to be adjudicated upon. Unless such a protection is given by law to a person who is likely to be adversely affected by an adjudication, the right of hearing, as contemplated by sub-section (3) of Section 7-A would be an illusory safeguard. The mere fact that rules have been promulgated which provide for recruitment and conditions of service, of Commissioners, known as the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation (Commissioners) Recruitment Rules